NVIDIA GeForce 840A vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 840A and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 840A
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 40% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 736 MHz
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 384 vs 288
- Around 2% better floating-point performance: 863.2 gflops vs 847.9 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 4.5x lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 150 Watt
Launch date | 17 March 2014 vs 20 February 2012 |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz vs 736 MHz |
Pipelines | 384 vs 288 |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops vs 847.9 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE
- Around 96% higher texture fill rate: 35.33 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s
- Around 91% higher memory clock speed: 3828 MHz vs 2002 MHz
- Around 67% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1914 vs 1145
- Around 73% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 423 vs 245
- Around 25% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7009 vs 5596
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2970 vs 2188
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2970 vs 2188
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3114 vs 2314
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3114 vs 2314
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3117
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3117
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 35.33 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s |
Memory clock speed | 3828 MHz vs 2002 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1914 vs 1145 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 423 vs 245 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7009 vs 5596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2970 vs 2188 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2970 vs 2188 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3114 vs 2314 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3114 vs 2314 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3117 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3117 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 840A
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 840A | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1145 | 1914 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 245 | 423 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5596 | 7009 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2188 | 2970 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2188 | 2970 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2314 | 3114 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2314 | 3114 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3117 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3117 | 3356 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.456 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 618.773 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.693 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.232 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 50.114 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 840A | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | GM108 | GF114 |
Launch date | 17 March 2014 | 20 February 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 966 | 967 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $89.99 | |
Price now | $89.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 28.95 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 736 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | 847.9 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 288 |
Texture fill rate | 17.98 GTexel / s | 35.33 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 210 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB / s | 91.87 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | 3828 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |