NVIDIA GeForce 840M vs AMD Radeon HD 6550D

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 840M and AMD Radeon HD 6550D videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 840M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
  • Around 72% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 600 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 32 nm
  • 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1096 vs 401
  • Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 151 vs 131
  • 4.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5771 vs 1316
  • Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2085 vs 1382
  • Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2736 vs 1975
  • Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2085 vs 1382
  • Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2736 vs 1975
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 12 March 2014 vs 30 June 2011
Core clock speed 1029 MHz vs 600 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 32 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1096 vs 401
PassMark - G2D Mark 151 vs 131
Geekbench - OpenCL 5771 vs 1316
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2085 vs 1382
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2736 vs 1975
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2085 vs 1382
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2736 vs 1975

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6550D

  • Around 4% higher pipelines: 400 vs 384
  • Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3324 vs 3191
  • Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3324 vs 3191
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 400 vs 384
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3324 vs 3191
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3324 vs 3191

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 840M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6550D

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1096
401
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
151
131
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
5771
1316
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2085
1382
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2736
1975
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3191
3324
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2085
1382
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2736
1975
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3191
3324
Name NVIDIA GeForce 840M AMD Radeon HD 6550D
PassMark - G3D Mark 1096 401
PassMark - G2D Mark 151 131
Geekbench - OpenCL 5771 1316
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 22.848
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 162.594
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.237
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 21.15
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 95.545
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2085 1382
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2736 1975
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3191 3324
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2085 1382
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2736 1975
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3191 3324
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 503

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce 840M AMD Radeon HD 6550D

Essentials

Architecture Maxwell Terascale 2
Code name GM108 Llano
Launch date 12 March 2014 30 June 2011
Place in performance rating 1235 1237
Type Laptop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1124 MHz
Core clock speed 1029 MHz 600 MHz
Floating-point performance 863.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 32 nm
Pipelines 384 400
Texture fill rate 17.98 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 33 Watt
Transistor count 1000 Million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0
Interface PCIe 3.0 x8
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 11
OpenGL 4.5

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 16.02 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 2002 MHz
Memory type DDR3
Shared memory 0 1

Technologies

CUDA
GameWorks
GeForce Experience
GPU Boost
Optimus