NVIDIA GeForce 840M vs NVIDIA GRID K180Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 840M and NVIDIA GRID K180Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 840M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- Around 21% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 850 MHz
- Around 32% higher texture fill rate: 17.98 GTexel / s vs 13.6 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
- 2.6x better floating-point performance: 863.2 gflops vs 326.4 gflops
- 3.9x lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 130 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 12% higher memory clock speed: 2002 MHz vs 1782 MHz
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1096 vs 534
- Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 151 vs 113
- Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2085 vs 1201
- Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2736 vs 1744
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3191 vs 2688
- Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2085 vs 1201
- Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2736 vs 1744
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3191 vs 2688
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 12 March 2014 vs 28 June 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 1029 MHz vs 850 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 17.98 GTexel / s vs 13.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 192 |
| Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops vs 326.4 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt vs 130 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz vs 1782 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1096 vs 534 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 151 vs 113 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2085 vs 1201 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2736 vs 1744 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3191 vs 2688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2085 vs 1201 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2736 vs 1744 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3191 vs 2688 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 840M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID K180Q
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce 840M | NVIDIA GRID K180Q |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1096 | 534 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 151 | 113 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5745 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.848 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 162.594 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.237 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.15 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 95.545 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2085 | 1201 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2736 | 1744 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3191 | 2688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2085 | 1201 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2736 | 1744 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3191 | 2688 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 503 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce 840M | NVIDIA GRID K180Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Code name | GM108 | GK107 |
| Launch date | 12 March 2014 | 28 June 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 1256 | 1257 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $125 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | 326.4 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
| Texture fill rate | 17.98 GTexel / s | 13.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 130 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB / s | 28.51 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | 1782 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce 840M with others
NVIDIAGeForce 840M vs
ATIRadeon 9000
NVIDIAGeForce 840M vs
ATIRadeon X1600
NVIDIAGeForce 840M vs
AMDRadeon HD 7620G IGP
NVIDIAGeForce 840M vs
NVIDIAQuadro K2000M
NVIDIAGeForce 840M vs
NVIDIAGRID K180Q
NVIDIAGeForce 840M vs
AMDRadeon R7 M260DX
