AMD Radeon R7 M260DX vs NVIDIA GeForce 840M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M260DX and NVIDIA GeForce 840M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M260DX

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
  • 3.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 18010 vs 5620
  • Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 195 vs 149
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 12 October 2014 vs 12 March 2014
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 18010 vs 5620
PassMark - G2D Mark 195 vs 149

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 840M

  • Around 11% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 925 MHz
  • Around 20% higher boost clock speed: 1124 MHz vs 940 MHz
  • Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2085 vs 1047
  • Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2085 vs 1047
  • 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2736 vs 1019
  • 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2736 vs 1019
  • Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3191 vs 2165
  • Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3191 vs 2165
  • Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1087 vs 817
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1029 MHz vs 925 MHz
Boost clock speed 1124 MHz vs 940 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2085 vs 1047
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2085 vs 1047
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2736 vs 1019
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2736 vs 1019
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3191 vs 2165
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3191 vs 2165
PassMark - G3D Mark 1087 vs 817

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M260DX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 840M

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
18010
5620
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1047
2085
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1047
2085
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1019
2736
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1019
2736
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2165
3191
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2165
3191
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
195
149
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
817
1087
Name AMD Radeon R7 M260DX NVIDIA GeForce 840M
Geekbench - OpenCL 18010 5620
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1047 2085
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1047 2085
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1019 2736
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1019 2736
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2165 3191
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2165 3191
PassMark - G2D Mark 195 149
PassMark - G3D Mark 817 1087
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 22.848
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 162.594
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.237
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 21.15
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 95.545
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 503

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R7 M260DX NVIDIA GeForce 840M

Essentials

Architecture GCN 3.0 Maxwell
Code name Topaz GM108
Launch date 12 October 2014 12 March 2014
Place in performance rating 1267 1268
Type Desktop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 940 MHz 1124 MHz
Core clock speed 925 MHz 1029 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Transistor count 3,100 million
Floating-point performance 863.2 gflops
Pipelines 384
Texture fill rate 17.98 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 33 Watt

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface IGP PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus support PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.5

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 16.02 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 2002 MHz
Memory type DDR3
Shared memory 0

Technologies

CUDA
GameWorks
GeForce Experience
GPU Boost
Optimus