NVIDIA GeForce 840M versus NVIDIA GRID K180Q
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce 840M and NVIDIA GRID K180Q pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 840M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 21% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1029 MHz versus 850 MHz
- Environ 32% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 17.98 GTexel / s versus 13.6 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 192
- 2.6x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 863.2 gflops versus 326.4 gflops
- 3.9x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 33 Watt versus 130 Watt
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 12% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 2002 MHz versus 1782 MHz
- 2.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1096 versus 534
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 151 versus 113
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2085 versus 1201
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2736 versus 1744
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3191 versus 2688
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2085 versus 1201
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2736 versus 1744
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3191 versus 2688
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 12 March 2014 versus 28 June 2013 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1029 MHz versus 850 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 17.98 GTexel / s versus 13.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 versus 192 |
Performance á point flottant | 863.2 gflops versus 326.4 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt versus 130 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 1 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2002 MHz versus 1782 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1096 versus 534 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 151 versus 113 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2085 versus 1201 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2736 versus 1744 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3191 versus 2688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2085 versus 1201 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2736 versus 1744 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3191 versus 2688 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 840M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID K180Q
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce 840M | NVIDIA GRID K180Q |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1096 | 534 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 151 | 113 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5745 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.848 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 162.594 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.237 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.15 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 95.545 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2085 | 1201 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2736 | 1744 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3191 | 2688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2085 | 1201 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2736 | 1744 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3191 | 2688 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 503 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce 840M | NVIDIA GRID K180Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
Nom de code | GM108 | GK107 |
Date de sortie | 12 March 2014 | 28 June 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1256 | 1257 |
Genre | Laptop | Workstation |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $125 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1124 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1029 MHz | 850 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 863.2 gflops | 326.4 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 17.98 GTexel / s | 13.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 130 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,270 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 16.02 GB / s | 28.51 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2002 MHz | 1782 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus |