NVIDIA GeForce 840M vs NVIDIA GeForce 705M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 840M and NVIDIA GeForce 705M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 840M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
• Around 39% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 738 MHz
• 3x more texture fill rate: 17.98 GTexel / s vs 5.904 GTexel / s
• 8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
• 6.1x better floating-point performance: 863.2 gflops vs 141.7 gflops
• 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 2002 MHz vs 1800 MHz
• 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1096 vs 456
• 5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 22.848 vs 4.569
• Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 162.594 vs 115.15
• 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.237 vs 0.373
• 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.15 vs 7.904
• 8.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 95.545 vs 11.055
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2736 vs 1131
• Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3191 vs 1629
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2736 vs 1131
• Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3191 vs 1629

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 705M

• 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 33 Watt
• 3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 455 vs 151

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 840M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 705M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1096 456
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	151 455
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	22.848 4.569
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	162.594 115.15
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.237 0.373
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21.15 7.904
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	95.545 11.055
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2736 1131
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3191 1629
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2736 1131
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3191 1629

Compare specifications (specs)