NVIDIA GeForce 840M vs AMD Radeon HD 7570
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 840M and AMD Radeon HD 7570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 840M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 58% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 650 MHz
- Around 15% higher texture fill rate: 17.98 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
- Around 38% better floating-point performance: 863.2 gflops vs 624 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 82% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 60 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 2002 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- Around 79% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1096 vs 611
- 3.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5745 vs 1548
- 4.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 22.848 vs 4.874
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.237 vs 0.487
- Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.15 vs 14.033
- Around 66% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 95.545 vs 57.396
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2085 vs 1389
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2085 vs 1389
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 March 2014 vs 5 January 2012 |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 17.98 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops vs 624 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt vs 60 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1096 vs 611 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5745 vs 1548 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.848 vs 4.874 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.237 vs 0.487 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.15 vs 14.033 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 95.545 vs 57.396 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2085 vs 1389 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2736 vs 2724 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2085 vs 1389 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2736 vs 2724 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7570
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 480 vs 384
- Around 70% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 257 vs 151
- Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 259.769 vs 162.594
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 3191
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 3191
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 480 vs 384 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 257 vs 151 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 259.769 vs 162.594 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3191 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3191 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 840M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7570
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 840M | AMD Radeon HD 7570 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1096 | 611 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 151 | 257 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5745 | 1548 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.848 | 4.874 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 162.594 | 259.769 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.237 | 0.487 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.15 | 14.033 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 95.545 | 57.396 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2085 | 1389 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2736 | 2724 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3191 | 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2085 | 1389 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2736 | 2724 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3191 | 3355 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 503 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 840M | AMD Radeon HD 7570 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GM108 | Turks |
Launch date | 12 March 2014 | 5 January 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1248 | 1251 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 650 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | 624 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 480 |
Texture fill rate | 17.98 GTexel / s | 15.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 60 Watt |
Transistor count | 716 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB / s | 64 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus |