NVIDIA GRID M3-3020 vs NVIDIA GeForce 840M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GRID M3-3020 and NVIDIA GeForce 840M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID M3-3020
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1306 MHz vs 1124 MHz
- 2.9x more texture fill rate: 52.24 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
- Around 94% better floating-point performance: 1,672 gflops vs 863.2 gflops
- 2.6x more memory clock speed: 5200 MHz vs 2002 MHz
- Around 84% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 41.997 vs 22.848
- 4.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 726.846 vs 162.594
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.442 vs 1.237
- Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.991 vs 21.15
- Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 155.196 vs 95.545
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 May 2016 vs 12 March 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 1033 MHz vs 1029 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1306 MHz vs 1124 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 52.24 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 384 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,672 gflops vs 863.2 gflops |
| Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz vs 2002 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.997 vs 22.848 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 726.846 vs 162.594 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.442 vs 1.237 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.991 vs 21.15 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 155.196 vs 95.545 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID M3-3020
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 840M
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GRID M3-3020 | NVIDIA GeForce 840M |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.997 | 22.848 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 726.846 | 162.594 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.442 | 1.237 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.991 | 21.15 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 155.196 | 95.545 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1096 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 151 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5745 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2085 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2736 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3191 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2085 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2736 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3191 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 503 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GRID M3-3020 | NVIDIA GeForce 840M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell |
| Code name | GM107 | GM108 |
| Launch date | 18 May 2016 | 12 March 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 1247 | 1248 |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1306 MHz | 1124 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1033 MHz | 1029 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,672 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
| Texture fill rate | 52.24 GTexel / s | 17.98 GTexel / s |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB / s | 16.02 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | 2002 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GRID M3-3020 with others
NVIDIAGRID M3-3020 vs
ATIAll-In-Wonder Radeon 8500DV
NVIDIAGRID M3-3020 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 705M
NVIDIAGRID M3-3020 vs
AMDRadeon R7 240
NVIDIAGRID M3-3020 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 840M
NVIDIAGRID M3-3020 vs
IntelUHD Graphics 630
NVIDIAGRID M3-3020 vs
AMDRadeon 680M
