NVIDIA GeForce 845M vs AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 845M and AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 845M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- Around 38% higher core clock speed: 1071 MHz vs 775 MHz
- Around 47% higher boost clock speed: 1176 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 4500 MHz
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3287 vs 1667
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3326
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3287 vs 1667
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3326
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 26 August 2015 vs 5 May 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1071 MHz vs 775 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1176 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 4500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3287 vs 1667 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3326 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3287 vs 1667 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3326 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition
- Around 16% higher texture fill rate: 32 GTexel / s vs 27.62 GTexel / s
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
- Around 16% better floating-point performance: 1,024 gflops vs 883.7 gflops
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1558 vs 1524
- Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 353 vs 213
- Around 58% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9641 vs 6112
- Around 79% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.321 vs 1.295
- Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32.932 vs 22.387
- Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 111.138 vs 76.073
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2862 vs 2320
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2862 vs 2320
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 32 GTexel / s vs 27.62 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 640 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 1,024 gflops vs 883.7 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1558 vs 1524 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 353 vs 213 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9641 vs 6112 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.321 vs 1.295 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.932 vs 22.387 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 111.138 vs 76.073 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2862 vs 2320 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2862 vs 2320 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 845M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 845M | AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1524 | 1558 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 213 | 353 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6112 | 9641 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.295 | 2.321 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 22.387 | 32.932 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 76.073 | 111.138 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2320 | 2862 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3287 | 1667 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3326 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2320 | 2862 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3287 | 1667 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3326 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.151 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 516.994 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 845M | AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GM108 | Tropo |
Launch date | 26 August 2015 | 5 May 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 1029 | 1030 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1176 MHz | 800 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1071 MHz | 775 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 883.7 gflops | 1,024 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
Texture fill rate | 27.62 GTexel / s | 32 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,500 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB / s | 72 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 4500 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 / GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus |