NVIDIA GeForce 845M vs AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 845M and AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 845M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
  • Around 38% higher core clock speed: 1071 MHz vs 775 MHz
  • Around 47% higher boost clock speed: 1176 MHz vs 800 MHz
  • Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 4500 MHz
  • Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3287 vs 1667
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3326
  • Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3287 vs 1667
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3326
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 26 August 2015 vs 5 May 2015
Core clock speed 1071 MHz vs 775 MHz
Boost clock speed 1176 MHz vs 800 MHz
Memory clock speed 5012 MHz vs 4500 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3287 vs 1667
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3358 vs 3326
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3287 vs 1667
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3358 vs 3326

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition

  • Around 16% higher texture fill rate: 32 GTexel / s vs 27.62 GTexel / s
  • Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
  • Around 16% better floating-point performance: 1,024 gflops vs 883.7 gflops
  • Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1558 vs 1524
  • Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 353 vs 213
  • Around 58% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9641 vs 6112
  • Around 79% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.321 vs 1.295
  • Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32.932 vs 22.387
  • Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 111.138 vs 76.073
  • Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2862 vs 2320
  • Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2862 vs 2320
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 32 GTexel / s vs 27.62 GTexel / s
Pipelines 640 vs 384
Floating-point performance 1,024 gflops vs 883.7 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1558 vs 1524
PassMark - G2D Mark 353 vs 213
Geekbench - OpenCL 9641 vs 6112
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.321 vs 1.295
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 32.932 vs 22.387
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 111.138 vs 76.073
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2862 vs 2320
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2862 vs 2320

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 845M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1524
1558
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
213
353
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
6112
9641
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1.295
2.321
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
22.387
32.932
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
76.073
111.138
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2320
2862
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3287
1667
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3358
3326
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2320
2862
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3287
1667
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3358
3326
Name NVIDIA GeForce 845M AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition
PassMark - G3D Mark 1524 1558
PassMark - G2D Mark 213 353
Geekbench - OpenCL 6112 9641
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.295 2.321
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 22.387 32.932
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 76.073 111.138
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2320 2862
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3287 1667
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3358 3326
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2320 2862
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3287 1667
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3358 3326
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 25.151
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 516.994

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce 845M AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition

Essentials

Architecture Maxwell GCN 1.0
Code name GM108 Tropo
Launch date 26 August 2015 5 May 2015
Place in performance rating 1029 1030
Type Laptop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1176 MHz 800 MHz
Core clock speed 1071 MHz 775 MHz
Floating-point performance 883.7 gflops 1,024 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 384 640
Texture fill rate 27.62 GTexel / s 32 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 33 Watt
Transistor count 1,870 million 1,500 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL 4.6 4.5

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 16.02 GB / s 72 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 5012 MHz 4500 MHz
Memory type DDR3 / GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

CUDA
GeForce Experience
GPU Boost
Optimus