NVIDIA GeForce 845M vs NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 420
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 845M and NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 420 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 845M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 13 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 4.3x more core clock speed: 1071 MHz vs 250 MHz
- 27.6x more texture fill rate: 27.62 GTexel / s vs 1 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 150 nm
- 32x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 64 MB
- 30.2x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 166 MHz
- 304.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1524 vs 5
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 213 vs 168
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 26 August 2015 vs 6 February 2002 |
Core clock speed | 1071 MHz vs 250 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 27.62 GTexel / s vs 1 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 150 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 64 MB |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 166 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1524 vs 5 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 213 vs 168 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 845M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 420
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 845M | NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 420 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1524 | 5 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 213 | 168 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6112 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.295 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 22.387 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 76.073 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2320 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3287 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2320 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3287 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 845M | NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 420 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Celsius |
Code name | GM108 | NV17 A3 |
Launch date | 26 August 2015 | 6 February 2002 |
Place in performance rating | 1029 | 1026 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1176 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1071 MHz | 250 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 883.7 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 150 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | |
Texture fill rate | 27.62 GTexel / s | 1 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 29 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | AGP 4x |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 8.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 1.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 64 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB / s | 1.328 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 166 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 / GDDR5 | SDR |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus |