NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GS
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition and NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GS videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition
- 4.4x more texture fill rate: 33.6 GTexel / s vs 7.6 GTexel / s
- 3.5x more pipelines: 112 vs 32
- 5.5x better floating-point performance: 336.0 gflops vs 60.8 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 80 nm
- 2.6x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 700 MHz
Texture fill rate | 33.6 GTexel / s vs 7.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 112 vs 32 |
Floating-point performance | 336.0 gflops vs 60.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 80 nm |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 700 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GS
- Around 58% higher core clock speed: 950 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 6.3x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 125 Watt
Core clock speed | 950 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 125 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GS
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition | NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GS |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 134 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 59 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1053 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1053 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition | NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GS | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
Code name | G92 | G84 |
Launch date | 1 February 2008 | 1 February 2008 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 1603 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 950 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 336.0 gflops | 60.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 112 | 32 |
Texture fill rate | 33.6 GTexel / s | 7.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 20 Watt |
Transistor count | 754 million | 289 million |
CUDA cores | 32 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 229 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB / s | 22.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 700 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR2 / GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 |