NVIDIA GeForce 920MX vs AMD Radeon HD 6750
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 920MX and AMD Radeon HD 6750 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 920MX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 993 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 12% higher texture fill rate: 28.22 GTexel / s vs 25.2 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 5.4x lower typical power consumption: 16 Watt vs 86 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 71% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1080 vs 1047
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3691 vs 3378
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3691 vs 3378
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 25 March 2016 vs 21 January 2011 |
Boost clock speed | 993 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 28.22 GTexel / s vs 25.2 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 16 Watt vs 86 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1080 vs 1047 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 vs 3378 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 vs 3378 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6750
- 2.8x more pipelines: 720 vs 256
- Around 67% better floating-point performance: 1,008.0 gflops vs 602.1 gflops
- Around 79% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 271 vs 151
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2100 vs 1764
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2100 vs 1764
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 720 vs 256 |
Floating-point performance | 1,008.0 gflops vs 602.1 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 271 vs 151 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2100 vs 1764 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2100 vs 1764 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 920MX
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6750
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 920MX | AMD Radeon HD 6750 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1080 | 1047 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 151 | 271 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3912 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1764 | 2100 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 | 3378 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1764 | 2100 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 | 3378 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 385 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.039 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 544.041 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.867 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.664 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 91.074 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 920MX | AMD Radeon HD 6750 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GM108 | Juniper |
Launch date | 25 March 2016 | 21 January 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1035 | 1038 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $49.99 | |
Price now | $49.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 33.46 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 993 MHz | 900 MHz |
Core clock speed | 965 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 602.1 gflops | 1,008.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 256 | 720 |
Texture fill rate | 28.22 GTexel / s | 25.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 16 Watt | 86 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Length | 170 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 73.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus | ||
Verde Drivers | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire |