NVIDIA GeForce 920MX vs AMD Radeon HD 7730M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 920MX and AMD Radeon HD 7730M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 920MX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 68% higher core clock speed: 965 MHz vs 575 MHz
- Around 47% higher boost clock speed: 993 MHz vs 675 MHz
- Around 31% higher texture fill rate: 28.22 GTexel / s vs 21.6 GTexel / s
- Around 56% lower typical power consumption: 16 Watt vs 25 Watt
- Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1080 vs 758
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3691 vs 3220
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3691 vs 3220
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 25 March 2016 vs 24 April 2012 |
Core clock speed | 965 MHz vs 575 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 993 MHz vs 675 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 28.22 GTexel / s vs 21.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 16 Watt vs 25 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1080 vs 758 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 vs 3220 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 vs 3220 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3350 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7730M
- 2x more pipelines: 512 vs 256
- Around 15% better floating-point performance: 691.2 gflops vs 602.1 gflops
- Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 214 vs 151
- Around 73% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6787 vs 3912
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1777 vs 1764
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1777 vs 1764
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 512 vs 256 |
Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops vs 602.1 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 214 vs 151 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6787 vs 3912 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1777 vs 1764 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1777 vs 1764 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 920MX
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7730M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 920MX | AMD Radeon HD 7730M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1080 | 758 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 151 | 214 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3912 | 6787 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1764 | 1777 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 | 3220 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1764 | 1777 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 | 3220 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3350 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 385 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.244 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 289.172 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.524 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.319 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 69.757 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 920MX | AMD Radeon HD 7730M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GM108 | Chelsea |
Launch date | 25 March 2016 | 24 April 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1035 | 1149 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 993 MHz | 675 MHz |
Core clock speed | 965 MHz | 575 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 602.1 gflops | 691.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 256 | 512 |
Texture fill rate | 28.22 GTexel / s | 21.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 16 Watt | 25 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus | ||
Verde Drivers |