NVIDIA GeForce 930M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 930M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 930M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 4x more pipelines: 384 vs 96
- 3x better floating-point performance: 722.7 gflops vs 240.0 gflops
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1010 vs 497
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 149 vs 142
- 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5264 vs 2229
- Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1987 vs 999
- Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3706 vs 2333
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3257
- Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1987 vs 999
- Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3706 vs 2333
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3257
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 March 2015 vs 1 October 2012 |
Pipelines | 384 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 722.7 gflops vs 240.0 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1010 vs 497 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 149 vs 142 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5264 vs 2229 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1987 vs 999 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3706 vs 2333 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3257 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1987 vs 999 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3706 vs 2333 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3257 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 33 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 33 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 930M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 930M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1010 | 497 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 149 | 142 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5264 | 2229 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.344 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 166.907 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.225 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.899 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 84.246 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1987 | 999 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3706 | 2333 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3257 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1987 | 999 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3706 | 2333 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3257 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 930M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | GM108 | GF117 |
Launch date | 13 March 2015 | 1 October 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1217 | 1220 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 941 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 928 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 722.7 gflops | 240.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 22.58 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 15 Watt |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Transistor count | 585 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 2.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus | ||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 |