NVIDIA GeForce 930M versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce 930M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 930M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 5 mois plus tard
- 4x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 96
- 3x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 722.7 gflops versus 240.0 gflops
- 2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1010 versus 497
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 149 versus 142
- 2.4x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 5264 versus 2229
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1987 versus 999
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3706 versus 2333
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 versus 3257
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1987 versus 999
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3706 versus 2333
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 versus 3257
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 13 March 2015 versus 1 October 2012 |
Pipelines | 384 versus 96 |
Performance á point flottant | 722.7 gflops versus 240.0 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1010 versus 497 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 149 versus 142 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5264 versus 2229 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1987 versus 999 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3706 versus 2333 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 3257 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1987 versus 999 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3706 versus 2333 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 3257 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M
- 2.2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 33 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 33 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 930M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce 930M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1010 | 497 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 149 | 142 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5264 | 2229 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.344 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 166.907 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.225 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.899 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 84.246 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1987 | 999 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3706 | 2333 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3257 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1987 | 999 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3706 | 2333 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3257 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce 930M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi 2.0 |
Nom de code | GM108 | GF117 |
Date de sortie | 13 March 2015 | 1 October 2012 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1217 | 1220 |
Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 941 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 928 MHz | |
Performance á point flottant | 722.7 gflops | 240.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 96 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 22.58 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 15 Watt |
Noyaux CUDA | 96 | |
Compte de transistor | 585 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 2.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus | ||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 |