NVIDIA GeForce 930MX vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 930MX and NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 930MX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 3.4x more pipelines: 384 vs 112
- 2.3x better floating-point performance: 783.4 gflops vs 336.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
- 6.2x lower typical power consumption: 17 Watt vs 105 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
- 2x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 900 MHz
- 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1288 vs 454
- 3.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 195 vs 56
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3577 vs 2845
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3304
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3577 vs 2845
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3304
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 March 2016 vs 21 July 2008 |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 112 |
| Floating-point performance | 783.4 gflops vs 336.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 65 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 17 Watt vs 105 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1288 vs 454 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 195 vs 56 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3577 vs 2845 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3304 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3577 vs 2845 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3304 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
- Around 58% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 952 MHz
- Around 37% higher texture fill rate: 33.6 billion / sec vs 24.48 GTexel / s
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 952 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 33.6 billion / sec vs 24.48 GTexel / s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 930MX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce 930MX | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1288 | 454 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 195 | 56 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5533 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.565 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 165.338 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.09 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2053 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3577 | 2845 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3304 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2053 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3577 | 2845 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3304 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 495 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce 930MX | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Tesla |
| Code name | GM108 | G92 |
| Launch date | 1 March 2016 | 21 July 2008 |
| Place in performance rating | 1100 | 1063 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $160 | |
| Price now | $103.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 8.86 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1020 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 952 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 783.4 gflops | 336.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 112 |
| Texture fill rate | 24.48 GTexel / s | 33.6 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 17 Watt | 105 Watt |
| CUDA cores | 112 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
| Transistor count | 754 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVDual Link DVI |
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 9" (22.9 cm) | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 57.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce 930MX with others
NVIDIAGeForce 930MX vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX Go5300
NVIDIAGeForce 930MX vs
ATIMobility Radeon 9700
NVIDIAGeForce 930MX vs
AMDRadeon HD 7670 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce 930MX vs
AMDRadeon HD 7450A
NVIDIAGeForce 930MX vs
NVIDIAQuadro K2100M
NVIDIAGeForce 930MX vs
AMDRadeon 530
