NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT and NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 105 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 105 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
- Around 7% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1400 MHz
- 7.6x more texture fill rate: 33.6 billion / sec vs 4.4 billion / sec
- 7x more pipelines: 112 vs 16
- 11.4x better floating-point performance: 336.0 gflops vs 29.376 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 80 nm
- 2.3x more memory clock speed: 900 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 454 vs 169
- Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 56 vs 38
- Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2845 vs 1796
- Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2845 vs 1796
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3304 vs 1016
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3304 vs 1016
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 1400 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 33.6 billion / sec vs 4.4 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 112 vs 16 |
| Floating-point performance | 336.0 gflops vs 29.376 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 80 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz vs 400 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 454 vs 169 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 56 vs 38 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2845 vs 1796 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2845 vs 1796 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3304 vs 1016 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3304 vs 1016 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 169 | 454 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 38 | 56 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1796 | 2845 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1796 | 2845 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1016 | 3304 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1016 | 3304 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
| Code name | G86 | G92 |
| Launch date | 1 August 2008 | 21 July 2008 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $79.99 | $160 |
| Place in performance rating | 1460 | 1063 |
| Price now | $79.99 | $103.99 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 3.05 | 8.86 |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1400 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 16 | 112 |
| Floating-point performance | 29.376 gflops | 336.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 80 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | 105 °C |
| Pipelines | 16 | 112 |
| Texture fill rate | 4.4 billion / sec | 33.6 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 105 Watt |
| Transistor count | 210 million | 754 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | S / PDIF |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video, Dual Link DVI | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVDual Link DVI |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 6.6" (16.8 cm) | 9" (22.9 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | 57.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 400 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR2 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| SLI | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT with others
NVIDIAGeForce 9400 GT vs
ATIRadeon HD 3850
NVIDIAGeForce 9400 GT vs
ATIMobility FireGL V5700
NVIDIAGeForce 9400 GT vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9700M GTS
NVIDIAGeForce 9400 GT vs
ATIRadeon HD 4670
NVIDIAGeForce 9400 GT vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9600 GSO 512
NVIDIAGeForce 9400 GT vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 260M
