NVIDIA GeForce 940A vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 940A and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 940A
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 6.6x lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 219 Watt
- Around 5% higher memory clock speed: 2002 MHz vs 1900 MHz (3800 data rate)
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3361 vs 3325
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3361 vs 3325
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 March 2015 vs 7 December 2010 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt vs 219 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz vs 1900 MHz (3800 data rate) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 3325 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 3325 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
- Around 42% higher core clock speed: 1464 MHz vs 1029 MHz
- 2.4x more texture fill rate: 43.9 billion / sec vs 17.98 GTexel / s
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 480 vs 384
- Around 63% better floating-point performance: 1,405.4 gflops vs 863.2 gflops
- Around 25% higher maximum memory size: 1280 MB vs 1 GB
- 3.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3926 vs 1107
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 470 vs 214
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3668 vs 3615
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3668 vs 3615
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1464 MHz vs 1029 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 43.9 billion / sec vs 17.98 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 480 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 1,405.4 gflops vs 863.2 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 1280 MB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3926 vs 1107 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 470 vs 214 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3668 vs 3615 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3668 vs 3615 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 940A
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 940A | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1107 | 3926 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 214 | 470 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3615 | 3668 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3615 | 3668 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | 3325 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | 3325 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 13266 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.849 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 736.185 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.369 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.08 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 122.953 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4862 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4862 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 940A | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | GM108 | GF110 |
Launch date | 13 March 2015 | 7 December 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 731 | 734 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $349 | |
Price now | $99.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 48.11 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 1464 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | 1,405.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 480 |
Texture fill rate | 17.98 GTexel / s | 43.9 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 219 Watt |
CUDA cores | 480 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
SLI options | 3-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | Two 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1280 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB / s | 152.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 320 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | 1900 MHz (3800 data rate) |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |