AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100 vs NVIDIA GeForce 940A
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100 and NVIDIA GeForce 940A videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 1219 MHz vs 1124 MHz
- 2.2x more texture fill rate: 39.01 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
- Around 45% better floating-point performance: 1,248 gflops vs 863.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- 3x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 2002 MHz
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2543 vs 1107
- Around 98% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 424 vs 214
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 June 2017 vs 13 March 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 1219 MHz vs 1124 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 39.01 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 1,248 gflops vs 863.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 2002 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2543 vs 1107 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 424 vs 214 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 940A
- Around 11% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 925 MHz
- Around 97% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 65 Watt
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz vs 925 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3615 vs 3607 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3615 vs 3607 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 3359 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 940A
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100 | NVIDIA GeForce 940A |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2543 | 1107 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 424 | 214 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10552 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 29.959 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 864.134 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.893 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.305 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 122.245 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4551 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3607 | 3615 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4551 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3607 | 3615 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3361 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100 | NVIDIA GeForce 940A | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | Lexa | GM108 |
Launch date | 12 June 2017 | 13 March 2015 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Place in performance rating | 728 | 730 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1219 MHz | 1124 MHz |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 1029 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,248 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 39.01 GTexel / s | 17.98 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 33 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,200 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB / s | 16.02 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 2002 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |