NVIDIA GeForce 940M versus AMD Radeon R6 M255DX
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce 940M and AMD Radeon R6 M255DX pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 940M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 37% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1072 MHz versus 780 MHz
- Environ 38% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1176 MHz versus 855 MHz
- Environ 86% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1127 versus 605
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 155 versus 116
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2132 versus 1055
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3065 versus 1927
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2132 versus 1055
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3065 versus 1927
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 13 March 2015 versus 7 January 2014 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1072 MHz versus 780 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1176 MHz versus 855 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1127 versus 605 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 155 versus 116 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2132 versus 1055 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3065 versus 1927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2132 versus 1055 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3065 versus 1927 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R6 M255DX
- Environ 50% de pipelines plus haut: 576 versus 384
- 2.9x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 17123 versus 5958
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3563 versus 3357
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3563 versus 3357
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 576 versus 384 |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 17123 versus 5958 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3563 versus 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3563 versus 3357 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 940M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R6 M255DX
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce 940M | AMD Radeon R6 M255DX |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1127 | 605 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 155 | 116 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5958 | 17123 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.98 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 168.449 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.307 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.837 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 101.399 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2132 | 1055 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3065 | 1927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3563 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2132 | 1055 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3065 | 1927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3563 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 506 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce 940M | AMD Radeon R6 M255DX | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | GM108 | Jet |
| Date de sortie | 13 March 2015 | 7 January 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1200 | 1202 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1176 MHz | 855 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1072 MHz | 780 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 903.2 gflops | |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 576 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.22 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | |
| Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 1,040 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | IGP |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | medium sized |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| Enduro | ||
| Powerplay | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce 940M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce 940M vs
ATIRadeon 9200 PRO
NVIDIAGeForce 940M vs
ATIRadeon 9200
NVIDIAGeForce 940M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 745A
NVIDIAGeForce 940M vs
AMDRadeon R6 M255DX
NVIDIAGeForce 940M vs
AMDFirePro W2100
NVIDIAGeForce 940M vs
AMDRadeon 550X Mobile
