NVIDIA GeForce 940M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 940M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 940M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 5% higher core clock speed: 1072 MHz vs 1020 MHz
• Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 1176 MHz vs 1085 MHz
• Around 82% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 60 Watt
• 360x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3329
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3329
• 4.3x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 506 vs 117

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

• Around 54% higher texture fill rate: 43.4 GTexel / s vs 28.22 GTexel / s
• Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
• Around 54% better floating-point performance: 1,389 gflops vs 903.2 gflops
• 3.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3901 vs 1127
• 3.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 521 vs 154
• Around 93% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11526 vs 5982
• Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.463 vs 25.98
• 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 642.715 vs 168.449
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.933 vs 1.307
• Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 26.532 vs 21.837
• Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 133.458 vs 101.399
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4843 vs 2132
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 3065
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4843 vs 2132
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 3065

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 940M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1127 3901
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	154 521
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	5982 11526
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	25.98 42.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	168.449 642.715
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.307 2.933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21.837 26.532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	101.399 133.458
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2132 4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3065 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3329
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2132 4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3065 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3329
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	506 117

Compare specifications (specs)