NVIDIA GeForce 940M versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce 940M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 940M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 5% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1072 MHz versus 1020 MHz
- Environ 8% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1176 MHz versus 1085 MHz
- Environ 82% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 33 Watt versus 60 Watt
- 360x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1800 MHz versus 5.4 GB/s
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 versus 3329
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 versus 3329
- 4.3x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 506 versus 117
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 13 March 2015 versus 18 February 2014 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1072 MHz versus 1020 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1176 MHz versus 1085 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt versus 60 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz versus 5.4 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3329 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3329 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 506 versus 117 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- Environ 54% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 43.4 GTexel / s versus 28.22 GTexel / s
- Environ 67% de pipelines plus haut: 640 versus 384
- Environ 54% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,389 gflops versus 903.2 gflops
- 3.5x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3901 versus 1127
- 3.4x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 521 versus 154
- Environ 93% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 11526 versus 5982
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.463 versus 25.98
- 3.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 642.715 versus 168.449
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.933 versus 1.307
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 26.532 versus 21.837
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 133.458 versus 101.399
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4843 versus 2132
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 versus 3065
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4843 versus 2132
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 versus 3065
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 43.4 GTexel / s versus 28.22 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 640 versus 384 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,389 gflops versus 903.2 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3901 versus 1127 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 521 versus 154 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11526 versus 5982 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.463 versus 25.98 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 642.715 versus 168.449 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.933 versus 1.307 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.532 versus 21.837 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 133.458 versus 101.399 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4843 versus 2132 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 versus 3065 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4843 versus 2132 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 versus 3065 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 940M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce 940M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1127 | 3901 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 154 | 521 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5982 | 11526 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.98 | 42.463 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 168.449 | 642.715 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.307 | 2.933 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.837 | 26.532 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 101.399 | 133.458 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2132 | 4843 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3065 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3329 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2132 | 4843 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3065 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3329 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 506 | 117 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce 940M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell |
| Nom de code | GM108 | GM107 |
| Date de sortie | 13 March 2015 | 18 February 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1184 | 707 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $149 | |
| Prix maintenant | $299.01 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 15.02 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1176 MHz | 1085 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1072 MHz | 1020 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 903.2 gflops | 1,389 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.22 GTexel / s | 43.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 60 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 1,870 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 640 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | 86.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 5.4 GB/s |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| FXAA | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce 940M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce 940M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 645M
NVIDIAGeForce 940M vs
AMDRadeon R6 M255DX
NVIDIAGeForce 940M vs
AMDFirePro W2100
NVIDIAGeForce 940M vs
AMDRadeon R8 M350DX
NVIDIAGeForce 940M vs
AMDRadeon R5 M430
NVIDIAGeForce 940M vs
AMDRadeon E9171 MCM
