NVIDIA GeForce 940MX vs AMD Radeon R7 250

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 940MX and AMD Radeon R7 250 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 940MX

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• Around 6% higher texture fill rate: 23.83 GTexel / s vs 22.4 GTexel / s
• Around 6% better floating-point performance: 762.6 gflops vs 716.8 gflops
• 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 23 Watt vs 75 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• 4.4x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1150 MHz
• Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1518 vs 1058
• Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 28.91 vs 20.161
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 312.94 vs 304.279
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.83 vs 1.655
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 103.937 vs 96.934
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2486 vs 2179
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3587 vs 3170
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2486 vs 2179
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3587 vs 3170

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 250

• Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 993 MHz
• Around 65% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 284 vs 172
• Around 19% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7533 vs 6327
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.046 vs 27.833

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 250

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1518 1058
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	172 284
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	6327 7533
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	28.91 20.161
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	312.94 304.279
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.83 1.655
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.833 30.046
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	103.937 96.934
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2486 2179
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3587 3170
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2486 2179
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3587 3170
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3356

Compare specifications (specs)