NVIDIA GeForce 940MX vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 940MX and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 993 MHz vs 980 MHz
- 7.4x lower typical power consumption: 23 Watt vs 170 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 835.3x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
- Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 103.937 vs 86.208
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 28 June 2016 vs 10 May 2012 |
Boost clock speed | 993 MHz vs 980 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt vs 170 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 103.937 vs 86.208 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 954 MHz
- 4.3x more texture fill rate: 102.5 billion / sec vs 23.83 GTexel / s
- 3.5x more pipelines: 1344 vs 384
- 3.2x better floating-point performance: 2,459.5 gflops vs 762.6 gflops
- 3.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5345 vs 1516
- 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 537 vs 172
- 2.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15511 vs 6325
- Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 41.613 vs 28.91
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 971.208 vs 312.94
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.281 vs 1.83
- Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 40.404 vs 27.833
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7038 vs 2486
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3686 vs 3587
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7038 vs 2486
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3686 vs 3587
- 3.1x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1839 vs 585
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 954 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 102.5 billion / sec vs 23.83 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1344 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 2,459.5 gflops vs 762.6 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5345 vs 1516 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 537 vs 172 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15511 vs 6325 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.613 vs 28.91 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 971.208 vs 312.94 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.281 vs 1.83 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.404 vs 27.833 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7038 vs 2486 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3686 vs 3587 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7038 vs 2486 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3686 vs 3587 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1839 vs 585 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 940MX | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1516 | 5345 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 172 | 537 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6325 | 15511 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.91 | 41.613 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 312.94 | 971.208 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.83 | 4.281 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.833 | 40.404 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 103.937 | 86.208 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2486 | 7038 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3587 | 3686 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2486 | 7038 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3587 | 3686 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3361 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 585 | 1839 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
Code name | GM108 | GK104 |
Launch date | 28 June 2016 | 10 May 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1071 | 554 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
Price now | $474.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.20 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 993 MHz | 980 MHz |
Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 980 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 762.6 gflops | 2,459.5 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 1344 |
Texture fill rate | 23.83 GTexel / s | 102.5 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt | 170 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,540 million |
CUDA cores | 1344 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | Two 6-pin |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
SLI options | 3-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB / s | 192.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256-bit GDDR5 |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 6.0 GB/s |
Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus | ||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
FXAA | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |