NVIDIA GeForce 940MX vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce 940MX und NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 4 Jahr(e) 1 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 1% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 993 MHz vs 980 MHz
- 7.4x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 23 Watt vs 170 Watt
- 2x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 835.3x mehr Speichertaktfrequenz: 5012 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
- Etwa 21% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 103.937 vs 86.208
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 28 June 2016 vs 10 May 2012 |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 993 MHz vs 980 MHz |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 23 Watt vs 170 Watt |
Maximale Speichergröße | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 5012 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 103.937 vs 86.208 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
- Etwa 3% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:980 MHz vs 954 MHz
- 4.3x mehr Texturfüllrate: 102.5 billion / sec vs 23.83 GTexel / s
- 3.5x mehr Leitungssysteme: 1344 vs 384
- 3.2x bessere Gleitkomma-Leistung: 2,459.5 gflops vs 762.6 gflops
- 3.5x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5345 vs 1516
- 3.1x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 537 vs 172
- 2.5x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15511 vs 6325
- Etwa 44% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 41.613 vs 28.91
- 3.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 971.208 vs 312.94
- 2.3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.281 vs 1.83
- Etwa 45% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 40.404 vs 27.833
- 2.8x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7038 vs 2486
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3686 vs 3587
- 2.8x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7038 vs 2486
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3686 vs 3587
- 3.1x bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1839 vs 585
Spezifikationen | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 980 MHz vs 954 MHz |
Texturfüllrate | 102.5 billion / sec vs 23.83 GTexel / s |
Leitungssysteme | 1344 vs 384 |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 2,459.5 gflops vs 762.6 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5345 vs 1516 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 537 vs 172 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15511 vs 6325 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.613 vs 28.91 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 971.208 vs 312.94 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.281 vs 1.83 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.404 vs 27.833 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7038 vs 2486 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3686 vs 3587 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7038 vs 2486 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3686 vs 3587 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1839 vs 585 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 940MX | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1516 | 5345 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 172 | 537 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6325 | 15511 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.91 | 41.613 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 312.94 | 971.208 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.83 | 4.281 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.833 | 40.404 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 103.937 | 86.208 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2486 | 7038 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3587 | 3686 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2486 | 7038 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3587 | 3686 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3361 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 585 | 1839 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Maxwell | Kepler |
Codename | GM108 | GK104 |
Startdatum | 28 June 2016 | 10 May 2012 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1071 | 554 |
Typ | Laptop | Desktop |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $399 | |
Jetzt kaufen | $474.99 | |
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 13.20 | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 993 MHz | 980 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 954 MHz | 980 MHz |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 762.6 gflops | 2,459.5 gflops |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Leitungssysteme | 384 | 1344 |
Texturfüllrate | 23.83 GTexel / s | 102.5 billion / sec |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 23 Watt | 170 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 1,870 million | 3,540 million |
CUDA-Kerne | 1344 | |
Maximale GPU-Temperatur | 97 °C | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Audioeingang für HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC-Unterstützung | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximale VGA-Auflösung | 2048x1536 | |
Multi-Monitor-Unterstützung | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Busunterstützung | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop-Größe | medium sized | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | Two 6-pin |
Höhe | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Länge | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
SLI-Optionen | 3-way | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 40.1 GB / s | 192.2 GB / s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 64 Bit | 256-bit GDDR5 |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 5012 MHz | 6.0 GB/s |
Speichertyp | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Gemeinsamer Speicher | 0 | |
Technologien |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus | ||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
FXAA | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |