NVIDIA GeForce 945M vs AMD Radeon R9 M360
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 945M and AMD Radeon R9 M360 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 945M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 17% higher boost clock speed: 1085 MHz vs 925 MHz
- Around 1% higher texture fill rate: 29.81 GTexel / s vs 29.6 GTexel / s
- Around 1% better floating-point performance: 953.9 gflops vs 947.2 gflops
- Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1125 MHz
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2109 vs 1838
- Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 28.633 vs 19.479
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.988 vs 1.902
- Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 107.094 vs 87.811
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2961 vs 2801
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 1623
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2961 vs 2801
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 1623
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 October 2015 vs 5 May 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1029 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1085 MHz vs 925 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 29.81 GTexel / s vs 29.6 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 953.9 gflops vs 947.2 gflops |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1125 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2109 vs 1838 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.633 vs 19.479 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.988 vs 1.902 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 107.094 vs 87.811 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2961 vs 2801 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 vs 1623 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2961 vs 2801 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 vs 1623 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M360
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 86% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 446 vs 240
- Around 5% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8481 vs 8099
- Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 575.773 vs 380.461
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 34.15 vs 31.027
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 3343
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 3343
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 446 vs 240 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8481 vs 8099 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 575.773 vs 380.461 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 34.15 vs 31.027 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3343 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 945M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M360
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce 945M | AMD Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2109 | 1838 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 240 | 446 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8099 | 8481 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.633 | 19.479 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 380.461 | 575.773 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.988 | 1.902 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.027 | 34.15 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 107.094 | 87.811 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2961 | 2801 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 | 1623 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | 3360 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2961 | 2801 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 | 1623 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | 3360 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce 945M | AMD Radeon R9 M360 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GM107 | Tropo |
| Launch date | 27 October 2015 | 5 May 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 961 | 962 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1085 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 953.9 gflops | 947.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 512 |
| Texture fill rate | 29.81 GTexel / s | 29.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,500 million |
| Compute units | 8 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB / s | 72 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce 945M with others
NVIDIAGeForce 945M vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 6100 + nForce Go 430
NVIDIAGeForce 945M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 645 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce 945M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 800A
NVIDIAGeForce 945M vs
AMDRadeon R9 M360
NVIDIAGeForce 945M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce 945M vs
AMDRadeon 680M
