NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 945M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce 945M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 0 month(s) later
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 1176 MHz vs 1029 MHz
- Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1201 MHz vs 1085 MHz
- 2.6x more texture fill rate: 76.86 GTexel / s vs 29.81 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 1024 vs 512
- 2.6x better floating-point performance: 2,460 gflops vs 953.9 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 3.9x more memory clock speed: 7012 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 76.687 vs 28.633
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 890.785 vs 380.461
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 26 November 2015 vs 27 October 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1176 MHz vs 1029 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1201 MHz vs 1085 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 76.86 GTexel / s vs 29.81 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1024 vs 512 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,460 gflops vs 953.9 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 7012 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 76.687 vs 28.633 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 890.785 vs 380.461 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 945M
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 31.027 vs 28.659
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.027 vs 28.659 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 945M
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce 945M |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 76.687 | 28.633 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 890.785 | 380.461 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.659 | 31.027 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2109 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 240 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8099 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.988 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 107.094 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2961 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2961 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce 945M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | GM206 | GM107 |
| Launch date | 26 November 2015 | 27 October 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 960 | 961 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1201 MHz | 1085 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1176 MHz | 1029 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2,460 gflops | 953.9 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 512 |
| Texture fill rate | 76.86 GTexel / s | 29.81 GTexel / s |
| Transistor count | 2,940 million | 1,870 million |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.2 GB / s | 16.02 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7012 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 6100 + nForce Go 430
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960 OEM vs
ATIRadeon HD 2400 PRO
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce 800A
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960 OEM vs
AMDRadeon R9 M360
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce 945M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960 OEM vs
AMDRadeon 680M
