NVIDIA GeForce 945M versus AMD Radeon R9 M360
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce 945M and AMD Radeon R9 M360 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 945M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 14% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1029 MHz versus 900 MHz
- Environ 17% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1085 MHz versus 925 MHz
- Environ 1% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 29.81 GTexel / s versus 29.6 GTexel / s
- Environ 1% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 953.9 gflops versus 947.2 gflops
- Environ 60% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1800 MHz versus 1125 MHz
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2109 versus 1838
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 28.633 versus 19.479
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.988 versus 1.902
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 107.094 versus 87.811
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2961 versus 2801
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 versus 1623
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2961 versus 2801
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 versus 1623
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 27 October 2015 versus 5 May 2015 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1029 MHz versus 900 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1085 MHz versus 925 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 29.81 GTexel / s versus 29.6 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 953.9 gflops versus 947.2 gflops |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz versus 1125 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2109 versus 1838 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.633 versus 19.479 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.988 versus 1.902 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 107.094 versus 87.811 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2961 versus 2801 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 versus 1623 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2961 versus 2801 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 versus 1623 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 M360
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 86% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 446 versus 240
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 8481 versus 8099
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 575.773 versus 380.461
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 34.15 versus 31.027
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 versus 3343
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 versus 3343
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 446 versus 240 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8481 versus 8099 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 575.773 versus 380.461 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 34.15 versus 31.027 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 versus 3343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 versus 3343 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 945M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M360
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce 945M | AMD Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2109 | 1838 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 240 | 446 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8099 | 8481 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.633 | 19.479 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 380.461 | 575.773 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.988 | 1.902 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.027 | 34.15 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 107.094 | 87.811 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2961 | 2801 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 | 1623 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | 3360 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2961 | 2801 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 | 1623 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | 3360 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce 945M | AMD Radeon R9 M360 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | GM107 | Tropo |
| Date de sortie | 27 October 2015 | 5 May 2015 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 961 | 962 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1085 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1029 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 953.9 gflops | 947.2 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 512 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 29.81 GTexel / s | 29.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
| Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 1,500 million |
| Unités de Compute | 8 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Eyefinity | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 16.02 GB / s | 72 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Graphiques changeables | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce 945M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce 945M vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 6100 + nForce Go 430
NVIDIAGeForce 945M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 645 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce 945M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 800A
NVIDIAGeForce 945M vs
AMDRadeon R9 M360
NVIDIAGeForce 945M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce 945M vs
AMDRadeon 680M
