NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT Mac Edition and NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT Mac Edition
- 3.9x lower typical power consumption: 23 Watt vs 90 Watt
- Around 76% higher memory clock speed: 1584 MHz vs 900 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt vs 90 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1584 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512
- 3.3x more core clock speed: 1625 MHz vs 500 MHz
- Around 95% higher texture fill rate: 15.6 billion / sec vs 8 GTexel / s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 48 vs 32
- Around 95% better floating-point performance: 156 gflops vs 80 gflops
Core clock speed | 1625 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 15.6 billion / sec vs 8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 48 vs 32 |
Floating-point performance | 156 gflops vs 80 gflops |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT Mac Edition
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT Mac Edition | NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 330 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 79 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2239 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2239 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT Mac Edition | NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
Code name | G96 | G94 |
Launch date | 25 October 2008 | 23 October 2008 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 1435 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 1625 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 80 gflops | 156 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 32 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 8 GTexel / s | 15.6 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt | 90 Watt |
Transistor count | 314 million | 505 million |
CUDA cores | 48 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, Two Dual Link DVIHDTV |
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-II | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 9" (22.9 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 25.34 GB / s | 57.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1584 MHz | 900 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA |