NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT vs NVIDIA GeForce 8500 GT

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT and NVIDIA GeForce 8500 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
  • 2.2x more texture fill rate: 8 GTexel / s vs 3.6 billion / sec
  • 2x more pipelines: 32 vs 16
  • 2.7x better floating-point performance: 80 gflops vs 29.376 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 80 nm
  • Around 30% lower typical power consumption: 23 Watt vs 30 Watt
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 256 MB
  • 2x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 800 MHz
  • Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 150 vs 149
  • Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1679 vs 996
  • Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1679 vs 996
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 4 June 2008 vs 17 April 2007
Texture fill rate 8 GTexel / s vs 3.6 billion / sec
Pipelines 32 vs 16
Floating-point performance 80 gflops vs 29.376 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 65 nm vs 80 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 23 Watt vs 30 Watt
Maximum memory size 512 MB vs 256 MB
Memory clock speed 1600 MHz vs 800 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 150 vs 149
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1679 vs 996
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1679 vs 996

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8500 GT

  • 3.8x more core clock speed: 459 MHz vs 120 MHz
  • Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 32 vs 27
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 459 MHz vs 120 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 32 vs 27

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8500 GT

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
150
149
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
27
32
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1679
996
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1679
996
Name NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT NVIDIA GeForce 8500 GT
PassMark - G3D Mark 150 149
PassMark - G2D Mark 27 32
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1140
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1140
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1679 996
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1679 996

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT NVIDIA GeForce 8500 GT

Essentials

Architecture Tesla Tesla
Code name G96 G86
Launch date 4 June 2008 17 April 2007
Place in performance rating 1530 1657
Type Laptop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $129

Technical info

Core clock speed 120 MHz 459 MHz
CUDA cores 32
Floating-point performance 80 gflops 29.376 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 65 nm 80 nm
Pipelines 32 16
Texture fill rate 8 GTexel / s 3.6 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 23 Watt 30 Watt
Transistor count 314 million 210 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface MXM-II PCIe 1.0 x16
Laptop size medium sized
Supplementary power connectors None None
Length 229 mm

API support

DirectX 10.0 10.0
OpenGL 3.3 2.1

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 256 MB
Memory bandwidth 25.6 GB / s 12.8 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1600 MHz 800 MHz
Memory type GDDR2, GDDR3 GDDR3
Shared memory 0
Standard memory config per GPU 256 MB

Technologies

CUDA
PCI-E 2.0
SLI