NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT vs NVIDIA GeForce Go 7300
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT and NVIDIA GeForce Go 7300 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 57% higher core clock speed: 550 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 6.3x more texture fill rate: 8.8 GTexel / s vs 1.4 GTexel / s
- 8x more pipelines: 32 vs 4
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 90 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 256 MB vs 64 MB
- 2.3x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 700 MHz
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 137 vs 52
- 6.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1465 vs 224
- 6.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1465 vs 224
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 19 August 2008 vs 1 February 2006 |
Core clock speed | 550 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 8.8 GTexel / s vs 1.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 32 vs 4 |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 90 nm |
Maximum memory size | 256 MB vs 64 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 700 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 137 vs 52 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1465 vs 224 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1465 vs 224 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce Go 7300
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 114 vs 57
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 114 vs 57 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce Go 7300
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT | NVIDIA GeForce Go 7300 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 137 | 52 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 57 | 114 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1465 | 224 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1465 | 224 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT | NVIDIA GeForce Go 7300 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Curie |
Code name | G96 | G72 |
Launch date | 19 August 2008 | 1 February 2006 |
Place in performance rating | 1573 | 1574 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 350 MHz |
CUDA cores | 32 | |
Floating-point performance | 84.8 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 90 nm |
Pipelines | 32 | 4 |
Texture fill rate | 8.8 GTexel / s | 1.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt | |
Transistor count | 314 million | 112 million |
Boost clock speed | 350 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Maximum VGA resolution | 1920x1200 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Interface | MXM-II | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 64 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 5.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 700 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 700 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR2, GDDR3 | 64 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
PCI-E 2.0 | ||
CineFX 4.0 | ||
Intellisample 4.0 | ||
PowerMizer 6.0 | ||
UltraShadow II |