NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M vs NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M and NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 2x more core clock speed: 1120 MHz vs 550 MHz
- 3x more pipelines: 96 vs 32
- 2.5x better floating-point performance: 215.04 gflops vs 84.8 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 256 MB
- 3.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 519 vs 137
- 3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 171 vs 57
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 September 2010 vs 19 August 2008 |
Core clock speed | 1120 MHz vs 550 MHz |
Pipelines | 96 vs 32 |
Floating-point performance | 215.04 gflops vs 84.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 256 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 519 vs 137 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 171 vs 57 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT
- Around 31% higher texture fill rate: 8.8 GTexel / s vs 6.7 billion / sec
- 2x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1465 vs 690
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1465 vs 690
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 8.8 GTexel / s vs 6.7 billion / sec |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1465 vs 690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1465 vs 690 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M | NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 519 | 137 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 171 | 57 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1872 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.184 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 172.058 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.459 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.145 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 13.944 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 859 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 719 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 690 | 1465 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 859 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 719 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 690 | 1465 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M | NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Tesla |
Code name | GF108 | G96 |
Launch date | 3 September 2010 | 19 August 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1570 | 1573 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1120 MHz | 550 MHz |
CUDA cores | 96 | 32 |
Floating-point performance | 215.04 gflops | 84.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 32 |
Texture fill rate | 6.7 billion / sec | 8.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt | 23 Watt |
Transistor count | 585 million | 314 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Maximum VGA resolution | 1920x1200 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-II |
Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 10.0 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR2, GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus | ||
PCI-E 2.0 |