NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GT vs ATI All-In-Wonder 9000 PRO
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GT and ATI All-In-Wonder 9000 PRO videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 2.3x more core clock speed: 625 MHz vs 275 MHz
- 9.1x more texture fill rate: 10 GTexel / s vs 1.1 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 150 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 128 MB
- 3.6x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 450 MHz
- 41.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 209 vs 5
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 120 vs 103
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 29 July 2008 vs 31 March 2003 |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz vs 275 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 10 GTexel / s vs 1.1 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 150 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 512 MB vs 128 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 450 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 209 vs 5 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 120 vs 103 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GT
GPU 2: ATI All-In-Wonder 9000 PRO
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GT | ATI All-In-Wonder 9000 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 209 | 5 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 120 | 103 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1901 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1901 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GT | ATI All-In-Wonder 9000 PRO | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla | Rage 7 |
| Code name | G96 | RV250 |
| Launch date | 29 July 2008 | 31 March 2003 |
| Place in performance rating | 1374 | 1377 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 275 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 32 | |
| Floating-point performance | 99.2 gflops | |
| Gigaflops | 148 | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 150 nm |
| Pipelines | 32 | |
| Texture fill rate | 10 GTexel / s | 1.1 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 314 million | 36 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-II | AGP 8x |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.0 | 8.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 1.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 128 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 7.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 450 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR2, GDDR3 | DDR |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| PCI-E 2.0 | ||