NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GT vs NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GT and NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- Around 24% better floating-point performance: 99.2 gflops vs 80 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 80 nm
- 2x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 800 MHz
Launch date | 29 July 2008 vs 13 March 2008 |
Floating-point performance | 99.2 gflops vs 80 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 80 nm |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS
- 2x more core clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 625 MHz
- Around 55% lower typical power consumption: 29 Watt vs 45 Watt
- Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 270 vs 209
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 328 vs 120
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1250 MHz vs 625 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 29 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 270 vs 209 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 328 vs 120 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GT | NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 209 | 270 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 120 | 328 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1901 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1901 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GT | NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
Code name | G96 | G84 |
Launch date | 29 July 2008 | 13 March 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1374 | 507 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 1250 MHz |
CUDA cores | 32 | 32 |
Floating-point performance | 99.2 gflops | 80 gflops |
Gigaflops | 148 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 32 | 32 |
Texture fill rate | 10 GTexel / s | 10 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 29 Watt |
Transistor count | 314 million | 289 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-II | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | large |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR2, GDDR3 | GDDR2?, GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
PCI-E 2.0 |