NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GT vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 285
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GT and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 285 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 2.3x more core clock speed: 625 MHz vs 275 MHz
- 9.1x more texture fill rate: 10 GTexel / s vs 1.1 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 110 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 128 MB
- 3.2x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 4.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 209 vs 43
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 120 vs 97
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 29 July 2008 vs 6 June 2006 |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz vs 275 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 10 GTexel / s vs 1.1 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 110 nm |
Maximum memory size | 512 MB vs 128 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 209 vs 43 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 120 vs 97 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 285
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 45 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GT
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 285
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GT | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 285 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 209 | 43 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 120 | 97 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1901 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1901 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GT | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 285 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Curie |
Code name | G96 | NV44 A2 |
Launch date | 29 July 2008 | 6 June 2006 |
Place in performance rating | 1372 | 1375 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $27.99 | |
Price now | $61.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 0.72 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 275 MHz |
CUDA cores | 32 | |
Floating-point performance | 99.2 gflops | |
Gigaflops | 148 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 110 nm |
Pipelines | 32 | |
Texture fill rate | 10 GTexel / s | 1.1 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 18 Watt |
Transistor count | 314 million | 75 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DMS-59 |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-II | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR2, GDDR3 | DDR |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
PCI-E 2.0 |