NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+ vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+ and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 4.1x more core clock speed: 1836 MHz vs 450 MHz
- 4.4x more texture fill rate: 47.2 billion / sec vs 10.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 90 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 256 MB
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 494 vs 238
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 16 January 2009 vs 21 August 2006 |
| Core clock speed | 1836 MHz vs 450 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 47.2 billion / sec vs 10.8 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 90 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 512 MB vs 256 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 494 vs 238 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M
- 4x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 141 Watt
- Around 9% higher memory clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 111 vs 83
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 141 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 111 vs 83 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+ | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 54.055 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.986 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.56 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 108.412 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 83 | 111 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 494 | 238 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+ | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla | Curie |
| Code name | G92B | G71 |
| Launch date | 16 January 2009 | 21 August 2006 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | |
| Place in performance rating | 1305 | 1306 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1836 MHz | 450 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 128 | |
| Floating-point performance | 470.0 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 90 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
| Pipelines | 128 | |
| Texture fill rate | 47.2 billion / sec | 10.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 141 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Transistor count | 754 million | 278 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVDual Link DVI | No outputs |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
| SLI options | 2-way3-way | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.0 | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 70.4 GB / s | 19.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| SLI | ||
