NVIDIA GeForce G 102M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce G 102M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce G 102M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
Launch date | 3 March 2009 vs 15 January 2009 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275
- 3.1x more core clock speed: 1404 MHz vs 450 MHz
- 15x more pipelines: 240 vs 16
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 75% higher maximum memory size: 896 MB vs 512 MB
Core clock speed | 1404 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Pipelines | 240 vs 16 |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 896 MB vs 512 MB |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce G 102M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275
Name | NVIDIA GeForce G 102M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1378 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 63 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 23256 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3195 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3195 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce G 102M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | G9x | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | MCP75 | GT200B |
Launch date | 3 March 2009 | 15 January 2009 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 1225 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $249 | |
Price now | $119.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.43 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 1404 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 16 | 240 |
Transistor count | 282 Million | 1,400 million |
CUDA cores | 240 | |
Floating-point performance | 673.9 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Texture fill rate | 50.6 billion / sec | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 219 Watt | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.0 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 896 MB |
Memory type | DDR2, DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Memory bandwidth | 127.0 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 448 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1134 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
Display Connectors | Two Dual Link DVI, 2x DVI | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way3-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
SLI |