NVIDIA GeForce G 103M vs NVIDIA GeForce G210M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce G 103M and NVIDIA GeForce G210M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce G 103M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
Launch date | 1 September 2009 vs 15 June 2009 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce G210M
- 2.3x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 640 MHz
- 2x more pipelines: 16 vs 8
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1294 vs 934
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1294 vs 934
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 640 MHz |
Pipelines | 16 vs 8 |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1294 vs 934 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1294 vs 934 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce G 103M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce G210M
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce G 103M | NVIDIA GeForce G210M |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 934 | 1294 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 934 | 1294 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 117 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 20 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2881 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce G 103M | NVIDIA GeForce G210M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | G9x | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | G98 | GT218 |
Launch date | 1 September 2009 | 15 June 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 1662 | 1663 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 640 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 8 | 16 |
CUDA cores | 16 | |
Floating-point performance | 48 gflops | |
Gigaflops | 72 | |
Texture fill rate | 5 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt | |
Transistor count | 260 million | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 500 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR2 | GDDR2, GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Dual Link DVIDisplayPortHDMISingle Link DVIVGA | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
Power management | 8.0 |