NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) and AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Memory, Technologies, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 36% higher core clock speed: 1228 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 80% higher boost clock speed: 1670 MHz vs 930 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 30% higher memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 4600 MHz
- Around 75% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2433 vs 1392
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 442 vs 379
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3629 vs 3112
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3684 vs 3168
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3629 vs 3112
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3684 vs 3168
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 17 May 2017 vs 21 December 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1228 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1670 MHz vs 930 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 4600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2433 vs 1392 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 442 vs 379 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3629 vs 3112 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 vs 3168 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3629 vs 3112 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 vs 3168 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
- 4.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 40722 vs 9864
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 512 vs 384 |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 40722 vs 9864 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 vs 3331 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 vs 3331 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) | AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2433 | 1392 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 442 | 379 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9864 | 40722 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.898 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 170.785 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.373 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.937 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 160.823 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3629 | 3112 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 | 3168 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3331 | 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3629 | 3112 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 | 3168 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3331 | 3346 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 35 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) | AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N17P-G1 | Cape Verde |
Launch date | 17 May 2017 | 21 December 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $69.99 | |
Place in performance rating | 874 | 604 |
Price now | $59.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 63.91 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1670 MHz | 930 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1228 MHz | 900 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 512 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 65 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 952.3 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 29.76 GTexel / s | |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
G-SYNC support | ||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12_1 | 12.0 (11_1) |
Vulkan | ||
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 4600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Memory bandwidth | 73.6 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin |