NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Memory, Technologies, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 3x more pipelines: 384 vs 128
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 55 nm
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 5.5x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- 4.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2433 vs 591
- 8.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 442 vs 54
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3684 vs 3108
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3684 vs 3108
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 17 May 2017 vs 4 March 2009 |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 128 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 55 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2433 vs 591 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 442 vs 54 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 vs 3108 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 vs 3108 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250
- Around 50% higher core clock speed: 1836 MHz vs 1228 MHz
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 3331
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 3331
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1836 MHz vs 1228 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 3331 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 3331 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2433 | 591 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 442 | 54 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9864 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.898 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 170.785 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.373 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.937 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 160.823 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3629 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 | 3108 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3331 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3629 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 | 3108 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3331 | 3351 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 35 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Tesla |
| Code name | N17P-G1 | G92B |
| Launch date | 17 May 2017 | 4 March 2009 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $69.99 | $199 |
| Place in performance rating | 874 | 1021 |
| Price now | $59.99 | $114.99 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 63.91 | 9.91 |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1670 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1228 MHz | 1836 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 128 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 150 Watt |
| CUDA cores | 128 | |
| Floating-point performance | 387.1 gflops | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
| Texture fill rate | 47.2 billion / sec | |
| Transistor count | 754 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| G-SYNC support | ||
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, Two Dual Link DVI | |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12_1 | 10.0 |
| Vulkan | ||
| OpenGL | 3.0 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
| Memory bandwidth | 70.4 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| VR Ready | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| SLI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Length | 9" (228.6 mm) (22.9 cm) | |
| SLI options | 2-way3-way | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) with others
NVIDIAGeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX Go5650
NVIDIAGeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) vs
ATIRadeon X600
NVIDIAGeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) vs
AMDRadeon HD 8650D IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) vs
AMDRadeon RX 550
NVIDIAGeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX150
NVIDIAGeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) vs
AMDRadeon Vega 6 Mobile
