NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Memory, Technologies, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 25% higher core clock speed: 1228 MHz vs 980 MHz
• Around 62% higher boost clock speed: 1670 MHz vs 1033 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 4.5x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 134 Watt
• 1000x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
• Around 4% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9864 vs 9482
• Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 36.898 vs 25.21
• 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 160.823 vs 51.009
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3629 vs 3426
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3684 vs 3642
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3331 vs 3242
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3629 vs 3426
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3684 vs 3642
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3331 vs 3242

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

• 2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
• Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3388 vs 2433
• Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 465 vs 442
• 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 561.43 vs 170.785
• Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.026 vs 1.373
• Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.868 vs 18.937
• 31.6x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1106 vs 35

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2433 3388
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	442 465
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	9864 9482
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	36.898 25.21
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	170.785 561.43
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.373 2.026
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	18.937 30.868
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	160.823 51.009
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3629 3426
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3684 3642
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3331 3242
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3629 3426
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3684 3642
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3331 3242
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	35 1106

Compare specifications (specs)