NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 25% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1228 MHz versus 980 MHz
- Environ 62% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1670 MHz versus 1033 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 4.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 30 Watt versus 134 Watt
- 1000x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 6000 MHz versus 6.0 GB/s
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 9864 versus 9482
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 36.898 versus 25.21
- 3.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 160.823 versus 51.009
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3629 versus 3426
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3684 versus 3642
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3331 versus 3242
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3629 versus 3426
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3684 versus 3642
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3331 versus 3242
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 17 May 2017 versus 26 March 2013 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1228 MHz versus 980 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1670 MHz versus 1033 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt versus 134 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6000 MHz versus 6.0 GB/s |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9864 versus 9482 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.898 versus 25.21 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 160.823 versus 51.009 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3629 versus 3426 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 versus 3642 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3331 versus 3242 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3629 versus 3426 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 versus 3642 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3331 versus 3242 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
- 2x plus de pipelines: 768 versus 384
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3388 versus 2433
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 465 versus 442
- 3.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 561.43 versus 170.785
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.026 versus 1.373
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.868 versus 18.937
- 31.6x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1106 versus 35
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 768 versus 384 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3388 versus 2433 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 465 versus 442 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 561.43 versus 170.785 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.026 versus 1.373 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.868 versus 18.937 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1106 versus 35 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2433 | 3388 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 442 | 465 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9864 | 9482 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.898 | 25.21 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 170.785 | 561.43 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.373 | 2.026 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.937 | 30.868 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 160.823 | 51.009 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3629 | 3426 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 | 3642 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3331 | 3242 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3629 | 3426 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 | 3642 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3331 | 3242 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 35 | 1106 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
Nom de code | N17P-G1 | GK106 |
Date de sortie | 17 May 2017 | 26 March 2013 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $69.99 | $169 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 874 | 810 |
Prix maintenant | $59.99 | |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 63.91 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1670 MHz | 1033 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1228 MHz | 980 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 768 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 134 Watt |
Noyaux CUDA | 768 | |
Performance á point flottant | 1,585 gflops | |
Température maximale du GPU | 97 °C | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 62.7 billion / sec | |
Compte de transistor | 2,540 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... | |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12_1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
Vulkan | ||
OpenGL | 4.3 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 192 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6000 MHz | 6.0 GB/s |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 144.2 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready | ||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Longeur | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | One 6-pin |