NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 and NVIDIA GeForce 9400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 2.3x more core clock speed: 1360 MHz vs 580 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 80 nm
- Around 75% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 220 vs 126
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1686 vs 800
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1686 vs 800
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 26 January 2010 vs 17 April 2007 |
| Core clock speed | 1360 MHz vs 580 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 80 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 220 vs 126 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1686 vs 800 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1686 vs 800 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9400
- Around 45% lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 58 Watt
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 61 vs 44
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt vs 58 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 61 vs 44 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9400
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 | NVIDIA GeForce 9400 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 220 | 126 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 44 | 61 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5892 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1686 | 800 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1686 | 800 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 | NVIDIA GeForce 9400 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
| Code name | G94 | MCP7A |
| Launch date | 26 January 2010 | 17 April 2007 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $79.99 | |
| Place in performance rating | 1583 | 1631 |
| Price now | $79.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 5.72 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1360 MHz | 580 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 48 | |
| Floating-point performance | 144 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 80 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
| Pipelines | 48 | |
| Texture fill rate | 14.4 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 58 Watt | 40 Watt |
| Transistor count | 505 million | 210 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF + HDA | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, VGADVIHDMI | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCI |
| Length | 6.6" (16.8 cm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.1 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 25.3 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 790 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GT 220 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4650
NVIDIAGeForce GT 220 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 580
NVIDIAGeForce GT 220 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 330M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 220 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 320M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 220 vs
IntelGraphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600
NVIDIAGeForce GT 220 vs
ATIRadeon HD 5770 X2
