NVIDIA GeForce GT 230M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 230M and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 230M
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 500 MHz
- Around 22% lower typical power consumption: 23 Watt vs 28 Watt
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt vs 28 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250M
- 2x more texture fill rate: 16 GTexel / s vs 8 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 96 vs 48
- 2.3x better floating-point performance: 240 gflops vs 105.6 gflops
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 554 vs 216
- Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 50 vs 38
- Around 46% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8215 vs 5644
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 16 GTexel / s vs 8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 96 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 240 gflops vs 105.6 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 554 vs 216 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 50 vs 38 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8215 vs 5644 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 230M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 230M | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 216 | 554 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 38 | 50 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5644 | 8215 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1727 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1727 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 230M | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | GT216 | GT215 |
Launch date | 15 June 2009 | 15 June 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 1598 | 1537 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 500 MHz |
CUDA cores | 48 | 96 |
Floating-point performance | 105.6 gflops | 240 gflops |
Gigaflops | 158 | 360 |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 8 GTexel / s | 16 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt | 28 Watt |
Transistor count | 486 million | 727 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | HDA | |
Display Connectors | Dual Link DVIVGADisplayPortHDMISingle Link DVI | HDMIVGALVDSSingle Link DVIDisplayPortDual Link DVI |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | PCI-E 2.0 |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | large |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Memory bandwidth | 16 (DDR2), 25 (DDR3) | 51.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR2, GDDR3 | DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
Power management | 8.0 | 8.0 |
MXM 3.0 Type-B | ||
PowerMizer 8.0 | ||
SLI |