NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M LE vs NVIDIA GeForce 305M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M LE and NVIDIA GeForce 305M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M LE
- 2.3x more texture fill rate: 9.6 GTexel / s vs 4.2 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 32 vs 16
- 2.6x better floating-point performance: 96 gflops vs 36.8 gflops
| Texture fill rate | 9.6 GTexel / s vs 4.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 32 vs 16 |
| Floating-point performance | 96 gflops vs 36.8 gflops |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 305M
- Around 92% higher core clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 600 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 64% lower typical power consumption: 14 Watt vs 23 Watt
| Core clock speed | 1150 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt vs 23 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M LE
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 305M
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M LE | NVIDIA GeForce 305M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 151 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 149 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1987 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M LE | NVIDIA GeForce 305M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | G96 | GT218 |
| Launch date | 15 January 2010 | 10 January 2010 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | 1356 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 96 gflops | 36.8 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 32 | 16 |
| Texture fill rate | 9.6 GTexel / s | 4.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt | 14 Watt |
| Transistor count | 314 million | 260 million |
| CUDA cores | 16 | |
| Gigaflops | 55 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | DisplayPortHDMIVGADual Link DVISingle Link DVI |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | 11.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | |
| Memory type | DDR2 | GDDR2, GDDR3, DDR2, DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| HybridPower | ||
| Power management | 8.0 | |

