NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M vs NVIDIA GeForce 7500 LE
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M and NVIDIA GeForce 7500 LE videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 1210 MHz vs 475 MHz
- 2.3x more texture fill rate: 8.8 GTexel / s vs 3.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 90 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 64 MB
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 213 vs 82
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 June 2009 vs 22 March 2006 |
Core clock speed | 1210 MHz vs 475 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 8.8 GTexel / s vs 3.8 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 90 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 64 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 213 vs 82 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 7500 LE
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 58 vs 49
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 58 vs 49 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 7500 LE
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M | NVIDIA GeForce 7500 LE |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 213 | 82 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 49 | 58 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6433 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1860 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1860 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M | NVIDIA GeForce 7500 LE | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Curie |
Code name | GT216 | G72 |
Launch date | 15 June 2009 | 22 March 2006 |
Place in performance rating | 1566 | 1569 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1210 MHz | 475 MHz |
CUDA cores | 48 | |
Floating-point performance | 116.16 gflops | |
Gigaflops | 174 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 90 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | |
Texture fill rate | 8.8 GTexel / s | 3.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt | |
Transistor count | 486 million | 112 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Single Link DVIDisplayPortDual Link DVIHDMIVGA | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 64 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 6.48 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3, GDDR2, GDDR3 | DDR2 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Memory clock speed | 810 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
Power management | 8.0 |