AMD ROG Ally Extreme vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M

Comparative analysis of AMD ROG Ally Extreme and NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD ROG Ally Extreme

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 13 year(s) 11 month(s) later
  • Around 24% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1210 MHz
  • 14727.3x more texture fill rate: 129.6 GTexel/s vs 8.8 GTexel / s
  • 16x more pipelines: 768 vs 48
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 40 nm
  • 16x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 1 GB
Launch date 13 Jun 2023 vs 15 June 2009
Core clock speed 1500 MHz vs 1210 MHz
Texture fill rate 129.6 GTexel/s vs 8.8 GTexel / s
Pipelines 768 vs 48
Manufacturing process technology 4 nm vs 40 nm
Maximum memory size 16 GB vs 1 GB

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M

  • Around 30% lower typical power consumption: 23 Watt vs 30 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 23 Watt vs 30 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD ROG Ally Extreme
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M

Name AMD ROG Ally Extreme NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 468
PassMark - G3D Mark 213
PassMark - G2D Mark 49
Geekbench - OpenCL 6433
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1860
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1860

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD ROG Ally Extreme NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M

Essentials

Architecture RDNA 3.0 Tesla 2.0
Code name Phoenix GT216
Launch date 13 Jun 2023 15 June 2009
Place in performance rating 1567 1564
Type Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 2700 MHz
Compute units 12
Core clock speed 1500 MHz 1210 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 4 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 768 48
Pixel fill rate 86.40 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 129.6 GTexel/s 8.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 30 Watt 23 Watt
Transistor count 25390 million 486 million
CUDA cores 48
Floating-point performance 116.16 gflops
Gigaflops 174

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x USB Type-C Single Link DVIDisplayPortDual Link DVIHDMIVGA
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Height 21 mm, 0.8 inches
Length 280 mm, 11 inches
Supplementary power connectors None
Width 111 mm, 4.4 inches
Bus support PCI-E 2.0
Interface PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) 10.1
OpenCL 2.1
OpenGL 4.6 2.1
Shader Model 6.7
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 51.20 GB/s 25.6 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1600 MHz, 6.4 Gbps effective
Memory type LPDDR5 DDR3, GDDR2, GDDR3
Shared memory 0

Technologies

CUDA
HybridPower
Power management 8.0