NVIDIA GeForce GT 330 OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 5670
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 330 OEM and ATI Radeon HD 5670 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 330 OEM
- Around 14% higher texture fill rate: 17.6 GTexel / s vs 15.5 GTexel / s
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2505 vs 2113
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2505 vs 2113
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 17.6 GTexel / s vs 15.5 GTexel / s |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2505 vs 2113 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2505 vs 2113 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5670
- Around 55% higher core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 4.2x more pipelines: 400 vs 96
- 2.4x better floating-point performance: 620.0 gflops vs 257.28 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 17% lower typical power consumption: 64 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 288 vs 72
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 803 vs 389
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 775 MHz vs 500 MHz |
| Pipelines | 400 vs 96 |
| Floating-point performance | 620.0 gflops vs 257.28 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 64 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 288 vs 72 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 803 vs 389 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 330 OEM
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5670
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 330 OEM | ATI Radeon HD 5670 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 72 | 288 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 389 | 803 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2505 | 2113 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2505 | 2113 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 610 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.914 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 184.557 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.319 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.627 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 27.325 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1462 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1129 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1462 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1129 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 330 OEM | ATI Radeon HD 5670 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | G92 | Redwood |
| Launch date | 2 February 2010 | 14 January 2010 |
| Place in performance rating | 1419 | 1420 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Design | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $119 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 775 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 257.28 gflops | 620.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 96 | 400 |
| Texture fill rate | 17.6 GTexel / s | 15.5 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 64 Watt |
| Transistor count | 754 million | 627 million |
| Boost clock speed | 775 MHz | |
| Stream Processors | 400 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 175 mm | 168 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.0 | 11 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 32.0 GB / s | 64 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GT 330 OEM with others
NVIDIAGeForce GT 330 OEM vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 1800
NVIDIAGeForce GT 330 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 230
NVIDIAGeForce GT 330 OEM vs
ATIRadeon HD 5670
NVIDIAGeForce GT 330 OEM vs
AMDRadeon HD 6520G
NVIDIAGeForce GT 330 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 555M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 330 OEM vs
AMDRadeon HD 7560D
