NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M and NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M
- Around 96% higher core clock speed: 1080 MHz vs 550 MHz
- Around 23% higher texture fill rate: 10.8 GTexel / s vs 8.8 GTexel / s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 72 vs 48
- Around 34% better floating-point performance: 155.52 gflops vs 116.16 gflops
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 28 Watt vs 35 Watt
- Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 376 vs 231
- Around 13% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7386 vs 6543
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2120 vs 1814
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2120 vs 1814
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1080 MHz vs 550 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 10.8 GTexel / s vs 8.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 72 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 155.52 gflops vs 116.16 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 28 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 376 vs 231 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7386 vs 6543 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2120 vs 1814 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2120 vs 1814 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
- Around 83% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 53 vs 29
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 53 vs 29 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 376 | 231 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 29 | 53 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7386 | 6543 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2120 | 1814 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2120 | 1814 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | GT215 | GT216 |
Launch date | 7 January 2010 | 7 January 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 1560 | 1561 |
Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1080 MHz | 550 MHz |
CUDA cores | 72 | |
Floating-point performance | 155.52 gflops | 116.16 gflops |
Gigaflops | 233 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 72 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 10.8 GTexel / s | 8.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 28 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 727 million | 486 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Single Link DVIVGADisplayPortHDMIDual Link DVI | No outputs |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 25.28 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3, GDDR3 | GDDR3, DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Memory clock speed | 1580 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
MXM 3.0 Type-B | ||
Power management | 8.0 | |
PowerMizer 8.0 | ||
SLI |