NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 0 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 12 Watt vs 28 Watt
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 75 vs 32
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2380 vs 2120
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2380 vs 2120
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 January 2011 vs 7 January 2010 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 12 Watt vs 28 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 75 vs 32 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2380 vs 2120 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2380 vs 2120 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M
- Around 61% higher core clock speed: 1080 MHz vs 672 MHz
- Around 83% higher texture fill rate: 10.8 GTexel / s vs 5.9 billion / sec
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 72 vs 48
- Around 21% better floating-point performance: 155.52 gflops vs 129.02 gflops
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 382 vs 281
- 5.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7386 vs 1333
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1080 MHz vs 672 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 10.8 GTexel / s vs 5.9 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 72 vs 48 |
| Floating-point performance | 155.52 gflops vs 129.02 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 382 vs 281 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7386 vs 1333 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 281 | 382 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 75 | 32 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1333 | 7386 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.237 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 83.376 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.26 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.92 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.992 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 536 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1731 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2380 | 2120 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 536 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1731 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2380 | 2120 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | GF108 | GT215 |
| Launch date | 5 January 2011 | 7 January 2010 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $59.99 | |
| Place in performance rating | 1565 | 1567 |
| Price now | $59.99 | |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 7.54 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 672 MHz | 1080 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 48 | 72 |
| Floating-point performance | 129.02 gflops | 155.52 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 48 | 72 |
| Texture fill rate | 5.9 billion / sec | 10.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 12 Watt | 28 Watt |
| Transistor count | 585 million | 727 million |
| Gigaflops | 233 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Single Link DVIVGADisplayPortHDMIDual Link DVI |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 10.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3, GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectCompute | ||
| Optimus | ||
| Verde Drivers | ||
| HybridPower | ||
| MXM 3.0 Type-B | ||
| Power management | 8.0 | |
| PowerMizer 8.0 | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M with others
NVIDIAGeForce GT 520M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 240M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 520M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 335M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 520M vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5145
NVIDIAGeForce GT 520M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 410M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 520M vs
AMDRadeon HD 6410D IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GT 520M vs
AMDRadeon R5 Graphics
